This page gathers published work employing the contextual cueing paradigm. The contextual cuing paradigm tests how repeated exposure to target/distractors arrangements affects search, and learned “contexts” lead to improved search efficiency. The contextual cueing paradigm is an important tool for our understanding about roles of environmental regularities, processes involved in learning and retrieving these features in search. Since its debut in 1998 the paradigm has been used in its original and modified forms, combined with brain imaging techniques, used in developmental, patient and animal studies, and also in cross-modal studies.
Since our research group (Experimental Psychology at LMU Munich) have been conducting studies employing this paradigm for several years, we have accumulated this list. And why not share it! In addition, we’ve got inspiration from a similar initiative by the Yale Perception & Cognition Lab. Feel free to inform us about any new updates or related work that is not yet listed here!  Xuelian Zang or Leonardo Assumpção are happy to hear from you.

1998

1. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28-71.

1999

2. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1999). Top-Down Attentional Guidance Based on Implicit Learning of Visual Covariation. Psychological Science, 10(4), 360-365. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00168.
3. Chun, M. M., & Phelps, E. A. (1999). Memory deficits for implicit contextual information in amnesic subjects with hippocampal damage. Nature Neuroscience, 2(9), 844-847.

2000

4. Chun, M. M. (2000). Contextual cueing of visual attention. Trends In Cognitive Sciences, 4, 170-178.
5. Chun, M. M., & Nakayama, K. (2000). On the Functional Role of Implicit Visual Memory for the Adaptive Deployment of Attention Across Scenes. Visual Cognition, 7(1-3), 65-81. doi: 10.1080/135062800394685.

2001

6. Jiang, Y., & Chun, M. M. (2001). Selective attention modulates implicit learning.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 54(4), 1105-1124.
7. Olson, I. R., & Chun, M. M. (2001). Temporal Contextual Cuing of Visual Attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(5), 1299-1313. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.27.5.1299
8. Olson, I. R., Chun, M. M., & Allison, T. (2001). Contextual guidance of attention. Brain, 124(7), 1417-1425.
9. Peterson, M. S. , & Kramer, A. F. (2001). Attentional guidance of the eyes by contextual information and abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 63(7), 1239-1249. doi: 10.3758/BF03194537
10. Peterson M. S., Kramer A. F. (2001), Contextual cueing reduces interference from task-irrelevant onset distractors. Visual Cognition, 8(6): 843-859.

2002

11. Endo, N., & Takeda, Y. (2002). Interaction Between Object Cueing and Spatial Cueing in Visual Search. In First International Workshop on Attention and Cognition.
12. Ogawa, H., & Yagi, A. (2002). The implicit processing in multiple object tracking. Technical report on Attention and Cognition, 1, 1-4.
13. Olson, I. R., & Chun, M. M. (2002). Perceptual constraints on implicit learning of spatial context. Visual Cognition, 9, 273-302. doi: 10.1080/13506280042000162
14. Peterson, M. S., Kramer, A. F., & Colcombe, A. (2002). Contextual guidance of attention in younger and older adults. In 2002 Cognitive Aging Conference.

2003

15. Balkenius, C. (2003). Cognitive processes in contextual cueing. In Proceedings of the european cognitive science conference(pp. 43-47).
16. Chua, K. P., & Chun, M. M. (2003). Implicit scene learning is viewpoint dependent. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 72-80.
17. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (2003). Implicit, Long-Term Spatial Contextual Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(2), 224-234. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.2.224
18. Jiang, Y., & Chun, M. M.(2003). Contextual cueing Reciprocal influences between Attention and Implicit Learning. Jimenez,L.(Ed). Attention and implicit learning. Advances in Consciousness Research, vol. 48, 277-296.
19. Kawahara, J. I. (2003). Contextual cueing in 3D layouts defined by binocular disparity. Visual Cognition, 10(7), 837-852.
20. Nabeta T, Ono F, Kawahara J. Transfer of spatial context from visual to haptic search. Perception, 2003, 32(11): 1351-1358.
21. Woodman, G. F., Chun, M. M.(2003). Access to visual working memory is required for contextual cueing in visual search. Journal of Vision, 3(9): 715, 715a, doi:10.1167/3.9.715.

2004

22. Howard Jr , J. H., Dennis, N. A., Howard, D. V., Yankovich, H., & Vaidya, C. J. (2004). Implicit Spatial Contextual Learning in Healthy Aging. Neuropsychology, 18, 124-134.
23. Jiang, Y., & Leung, A. (2004). Implicit learning of ignored visual context. Journal of Vision, 4(8), 188-188.
24. Jiang, Y., & Wagner, L. C. (2004). What is learned in spatial contextual cuing–configuration or individual locations? Perception and psychophysics, 66, 454-463.
25. Lleras, A., & Von Mühlenen, A. (2004). Spatial context and top-down strategies in visual search. Spatial Vision, 17(4), 465-482.
26. Olson, I. R., & Jiang, Y. (2004). Visual short-term memory is not improved by training. Memory & cognition, 32(8), 1326-1332.
27. Shomstein, S., & Yantis, S. (2004). Configural and contextual prioritization in object-based attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 247-253.
28. Tseng, Y.-C., & Li, C.-S. R. (2004). Oculomotor correlates of context-guided learning in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 66(8), 1363-1378.
29. Torralba, A. (2004). Contextual influences on saliency. Neurobiology of Attention: 586-592.

2005

30. Backhaus, A., Heinke, D., & Humphreys, G. W. (2005, June). Contextual learning in the selective attention for identification model (CL-SAIM): Modeling contextual cueing in visual search tasks. In 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’05)-Workshops(pp. 87-87). IEEE.
31. Chun, M. M. (2005). Drug-induced amnesia impairs implicit relational memory. Trends in Cognitie Sciences, 9 (8):355-357.
32. Endo, N., & Takeda, Y. (2005). Use of spatial context is restricted by relative position in implicit learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(5), 880-885.
33. Flusberg, S., Kunar, M., & Wolfe, J. M. (2005). In visual search, can the average features of a scene guide attention to a target?. Journal of Vision, 5(8), 948-948.
34. Hidalgo-Sotelo, B., Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. (2005). Human learning of contextual priors for object search: where does the time go?. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition-Workshops, CVPR Workshops. IEEE Computer Society Conference (pp. 86-86).
35. Hodsoll, J. P., & Humphreys, G. W. (2005). Preview search and contextual cuing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(6), 1346.
36. Hoffmann, J., & Sebald, A. (2005). Local contextual cuing in visual search. Experimental Psychology, 52(1), 31-38.
37. Jiang, Y., & Leung, A. W. (2005). Implicit learning of ignored visual context. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 100-106.
38. Jiang, Y., Song, J. H., & Rigas, A. (2005). High-capacity spatial contextual memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 524-529.
39. Jiang, Y., & Song, J. H. (2005). Hyperspecificity in visual implicit learning: learning of spatial layout is contingent on item identity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(6), 1439.
40. Jiang, Y., & Song, J. H. (2005). Spatial context learning in visual search and change detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 67(7), 1128-1139.
41. Ogawa, H., & Kumada, T. (2005). Coarse-to-fine encoding of contextual information in visual search. Journal of Vision, 5(8), 945-945.
42. Olson I R, Jiang Y, Moore K S. Associative learning improves visual working memory performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2005, 31(5): 889.
43. Ono F, Jiang Y, Kawahara (2005). Intertrial temporal contextual cuing: association across successive visual search trials guides spatial attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(4): 703-712.
44. Song, J. H., & Jiang, Y. (2005). Connecting the past with the present: how do humans match an incoming visual display with visual memory? Journal Of Vision, 5, 322-330. doi: 10.1167/5.4.4
45. Turk-Browne, N. B., Jungé, J. A., & Scholl, B. J. (2005). The automaticity of visual statistical learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(4), 552.
46. Van Asselen, M., Kessels, R. P., Wester, A. J., & Postma, A. (2005). Spatial working memory and contextual cueing in patients with Korsakoff amnesia. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 27(6), 645-655.
47. Vidal, J. R., Gauchou, H. L., Tallon-Baudry, C., & O’regan, J. K. (2005). Relational information in visual short-term memory: The structural gist. Journal of Vision, 5(3), 8.
48. Vomela, M., & Peterson, M. S. (2005). Better contextual memory for dense displays. Journal of Vision, 5(8), 866-866.

2006

49. Brockmole, J. R., Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2006). Contextual cueing in naturalistic scenes: Global and local contexts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(4), 699-706. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.699
50. Brockmole, J. R., & Henderson, J. M. (2006a). Recognition and attention guidance during contextual cueing in real-world scenes: Evidence from eye movements. The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 59(7), 1177-1187.
51. Brockmole, J. R., & Henderson, J. M. (2006b). Using real-world scenes as contextual cues for search. Visual Cognition, 13(1), 99-108.
52. Huang, L. (2006). Contextual cuing based on spatial arrangement of color. Perception & psychophysics, 68(5), 792-799.
53. Jiang, Y., King, L. W., Shim, W. M., & Vickery, T. J. (2006). Visual implicit learning overcomes limits in human attention. In Proceedings of the 25th Army Science Conference (ASC 2006).
54. Junge, J. A., Chun, M. M., & Scholl, B. J. (2006). Primacy effects in contextual cueing. Journal of Vision, 6(6), 1089-1089.
55. Kramer, A. F., Boot, W. R., McCarley, J. S., Peterson, M. S., Colcombe, A., & Scialfa, C. T. (2006). Aging, memory and visual search. Acta psychologica, 122(3), 288-304.
56. Kunar, M. A., Flusberg, S. J., & Wolfe, J. M. (2006). Contextual cueing by global features. Perception & Psychophysics, 68(7), 1204-1216. doi: 10.3758/BF03193721.
57. Neider, M. B., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2006). Scene context guides eye movements during visual search. Vision research, 46(5), 614-621.
58. Ogawa, H., & Kumada, T. (2006). Attentional prioritization to contextually new objects. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 13(3), 543-548.
59. Ogawa, H., & Watanabe, K. (2006). The time course of contextual modulation in visual search. Journal of Vision, 6(6), 840-840.
60. Smilek, D., Enns, J. T., Eastwood, J. D., & Merikle, P. M. (2006). Relax! Cognitive strategy influences visual search. Visual Cognition, 14(4-8), 543-564.
61. Torralba, A., Oliva, A., Castelhano, M. S., Henderson, J. M. (2006), Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: The role of global features in object search. Psychological Review, Vol 113(4), 766-786.
62. Walthew, C., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2006). Target location probability effects in visual search: an effect of sequential dependencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(5), 1294.

2007

63. Brady, T. F., & Chun, M. M. (2007). Spatial constraints on learning in visual search: modeling contextual cuing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(4), 798.
64. Chaumon, M., Drouet, V., Schwartz, D., & Tallon-Baudry, C. (2007). Learning of unconscious scene-target spatial associations involves the sharpening of a distributed network of visual areas. Journal of Vision, 7(9), 357-357.
65. Fuggetta, G., Campana, G., & Casco, C. (2007). The principle of good continuation in space and time can guide visual search in absence of priming or contextual cueing. Visual Cognition, 15(7), 834-853.
66. Goujon, A., Andre, D., & Marmeche, E. (2007). Contextual cueing based on specific and categorical properties of the environment. Visual Cognition, 15(3), 257-275.
67. Greene, A. J., Gross, W. L., & Elsinger, C. L. (2007). Hippocampal differentiation without recognition: an fMRI analysis of the contextual cueing task. Learning & Memory, 14, 548-553.
68. Johnson, J. S., Woodman, G. F., Braun, E., & Luck, S. J. (2007). Implicit memory influences the allocation of attention in visual cortex. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(5), 834-839.
69. Jungé, J. A., Scholl, B. J., & Chun, M. M. (2007). How is spatial context learning integrated over signal versus noise? A primacy effect in contextual cueing. Vision cognition, 15(1).
70. Kawahara, J.-I. (2007). Auditory-visual contextual cueing effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 69(8), 1399-1408.
71. Kawahara, J.-I. (2007). Cross-modal contextual cueing: Auditory and visual association guides spatial attention. Journal of Vision, 7(9), 1059-1059.
72. Kunar, M. A., Flusberg, S., Horowitz, T. S., & Wolfe, J. M. (2007). Does Contextual Cueing Guide the Deployment of Attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(4), 816-828.
73. Myers, C. W., & Gray, W. D. (2007). Are Eye Movements Involved in Cued Target Recall from Repeating Spatial Contexts?. In D. McNamara, & G. Trafton (Eds.), .), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Nashville, TN (pp. 515-520)
74. Negash, S., Boeve, B. F., Geda, Y. E., Smith, G. E., Knopman, D. S., Ivnik, R. J., … & Petersen, R. C. (2007). Implicit learning of sequential regularities and spatial contexts in corticobasal syndrome. Neurocase, 13(3), 133-143.
75. Ogawa, H., Takeda, Y., & Kumada, T. (2007). Probing attentional modulation of contextual cueing. Visual Cognition, 15(3), 276-289.
76. Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. (2007). The role of context in object recognition. Trends In Cognitive Sciences, 11(12), 520-527. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.09.009
77. Poggel, D. A., Strasburger, H., & MacKeben, M. (2007). Cueing attention by relative motion in the periphery of the visual field. Perception, 36(7), 955-970.
78. Preston, A. R., & Wagner, A. D. (2007). The medial temporal lobe and memory. Neurobiology of learning and memory, 2, 305-337.
79. Rausei, V., Makovski, T., & Jiang, Y. V. (2007). Attention dependency in implicit learning of repeated search context. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(10), 1321-1328.
80. Reynolds, A., & Miller, J. (2007). Mechanisms of the associated nontargets effect: Processes influenced by statistical learning in a simple visual environment. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(6), 837-859.
81. Schneps, M. H., Rose, L. T., & Fischer, K. W. (2007). Visual learning and the brain: Implications for dyslexia. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(3), 128-139.
82. Vaidya, C. J., Huger, M., Howard, D. V., & Howard Jr, J. H. (2007). Developmental differences in implicit learning of spatial context. Neuropsychology, 21(4), 497.

2008

83. Barnes, K. A., Howard Jr, J. H., Howard, D. V., Gilotty, L., Kenworthy, L., Gaillard, W. D., & Vaidya, C. J. (2008). Intact implicit learning of spatial context and temporal sequences in childhood autism spectrum disorder. Neuropsychology, 22(5), 563.
84. Becker, M. W., & Rasmussen, I. P. (2008). Guidance of attention to objects and locations by long-term memory of natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(6), 1325.
85. Bennett, I. J., Romano, J. C., Howard Jr, J. H., & Howard, D. V. (2008). Two forms of implicit learning in young adults with dyslexia. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1145(1), 184-198.
86. Brady, T. F., & Oliva, A. (2008). Statistical learning using real-world scenes extracting categorical regularities without conscious intent. Psychological Science, 19(7), 678-685.
87. Brockmole, J. R., Hambrick, D. Z., Windisch, D. J., & Henderson, J. M. (2008). The role of meaning in contextual cueing: Evidence from chess expertise. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(12), 1886-1896.
88. Castelo-Branco, M., & Asselen, M. V. (2009). The role of peripheral vision in implicit contextual cuing. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71(1),76-81.
89. Chaumon, M., Drouet, V., & Tallon-Baudry, C. (2008). Unconscious associative memory affects visual processing before 100 ms. Journal of vision, 8(3), 10.
90. Chun, M. M., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2008). Associative learning mechanisms in vision. Visual memory, 209-246.
91. Conci, M., & von Mühlenen, A. (2009). Figure-ground segmentation determines contextual learning in visual search. Journal of Vision, 9(8), 926-926.
92. Ehinger, K. A., & Brockmole, J. R. (2008). The role of color in visual search in real-world scenes: Evidence from contextual cuing. Perception & Psychophysics, 70(7), 1366-1378.
93. Kunar, M. A., Flusberg, S. J., & Wolfe, J. M. (2008). Time to Guide: Evidence for Delayed Attentional Guidance in Contextual Cueing. Visual Cognition, 16(6), 804-825. doi: 10.1080/13506280701751224
94. Lamy, D., Goshen-Kosover, A., Aviani, N., Harari, H., & Levkovitz, H. (2008). Implicit memory for spatial context in depression and schizophrenia. Journal of abnormal psychology, 117(4), 954.
95. Makovski T, Vázquez GA, Jiang YV (2008) Visual Learning in Multiple-Object Tracking. PLoS ONE 3(5): e2228. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002228
96. Miao, J., Qing, L., Duan, L., Chen, X., & Gao, W. (2008). Sparse Coding of Visual Context. In Advances in Cognitive Neurodynamics ICCN 2007 (pp. 891-895). Springer Netherlands.
97. Ogawa, H., & Kumada, T. (2008). The encoding process of nonconfigural information in contextual cuing. Perception & psychophysics, 70(2), 329-336.
98. Preston, A. R., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2008). Dissociation between explicit memory and configural memory in the human medial temporal lobe. Cerebral Cortex, 18(9), 2192-2207.
99. Schankin, A., Stursberg, O., & Schubö, A. (2008). The role of implicit context information in guiding visual-spatial attention. In Cognitive Vision (pp. 93-106). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
100. Sigurdardottir, H. M., Kristjánsson, Á., & Driver, J. (2008). Repetition streaks increase perceptual sensitivity in visual search of brief displays. Visual Cognition, 16(5), 643-658.
101. Smyth, A. C., & Shanks, D. R. (2008). Awareness in contextual cuing with extended and concurrent explicit test. Memory & Cognition, 36(2), 403-415. doi: 10.3758/MC.36.2.403

2009

102. Bennett, I. J., Barnes, K. A., Howard, J. H., & Howard, D. V. (2009). An abbreviated implicit spatial context learning task that yields greater learning. Behavior research methods, 41(2), 391-395.
103. Chaumon, M., Schwartz, D., & Tallon-Baudry, C. (2009). Unconscious learning versus visual perception: dissociable roles for gamma oscillations revealed in MEG. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(12), 2287-2299.
104. Chaumon, M., Hasboun, D., Baulac, M., Adam, C., & Tallon-Baudry, C. (2009). Unconscious contextual memory affects early responses in the anterior temporal lobe. Brain research, 1285, 77-87.
105. Conci, M., & von Mühlenen, A. (2009). Region segmentation and contextual cuing. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71(7), 1514-1524.
106. Goujon, A., Didierjean, A., & Marmeche, E. (2009). Semantic contextual cuing and visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(1), 50.
107. Manginelli, A. A., & Pollmann, S. (2009). Misleading contextual cues: how do they affect visual search? Psychological Research, 73(2), 212-221.
108. Mednick, S. C., Makovski, T., Cai, D. J., & Jiang, Y. V. (2009). Sleep and rest facilitate implicit memory in a visual search task. Vision research, 49(21), 2557-2565.
109. Ogawa, H., Watanabe, K., & Yagi, A. (2009). Contextual cueing in multiple object tracking. Visual Cognition, 17(8).
110. Pollmann, S., & Manginelli, A. A. (2009b). Early implicit contextual change detection in anterior prefrontal cortex. Brain Research, 1263, 87-92.
111. Pollmann, S., & Manginelli, A. A. (2009a). Anterior prefrontal involvement in implicit contextual change detection. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 3, 28. doi: 10.3389/neuro.09.028.2009.
112. Portugal, G. S., & Gould, T. J. (2009). Nicotine withdrawal disrupts new contextual learning. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 92(1), 117-123.
113. Schankin, A., & Schubö, A. (2009). Cognitive processes facilitated by contextual cueing: Evidence from event‐related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 46(3), 668-679.
114. Schankin, A., & Schubö, A. (2009). The time course of attentional guidance in contextual cueing. In Attention in Cognitive Systems (pp. 69-84). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
115. van Asselen, M., Almeida, I., Andre, R., Januário, C., Gonçalves, A. F., & Castelo-Branco, M. (2009). The role of the basal ganglia in implicit contextual learning: A study of Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychologia, 47(5), 1269-1273.
116. van Asselen, M., & Castelo-Branco, M. (2009). The role of peripheral vision in implicit contextual cuing. Perception & Psychophysics, 71(1), 76-81.

2010

117. Barnes, K. A., Howard Jr, J. H., Howard, D. V., Kenealy, L., & Vaidya, C. J. (2010). Two forms of implicit learning in childhood ADHD.Developmental neuropsychology, 35(5), 494-505.
118. Brooks, D. I., Rasmussen, I. P., & Hollingworth, A. (2010). The nesting of search contexts within natural scenes: evidence from contextual cuing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(6), 1406.
119. Brown, J., Aczel, B., Jiménez, L., Kaufman, S. B., & Grant, K. P. (2010). Intact implicit learning in autism spectrum conditions.The quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 63(9), 1789-1812.
120. Dixon, M. L., Zelazo, P. D., & De Rosa, E. (2010). Evidence for intact memory‐guided attention in school‐aged children.Developmental Science, 13(1), 161-169.
121. Enache, A. C. (2010, November). Evaluation of implicit contextual memory with EEG methods. InProceedings of the 3rd WSEAS international conference on Advances in sensors, signals and materials (pp. 145-149). World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS).
122. Geyer, T., Shi, Z., & Müller, H. J. (2010). Contextual cueing in multiconjunction visual search is dependent on color- and configuration-based intertrial contingencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 36(3), 515-532. doi: 10.1037/a0017448
123. Geyer, T., Zehetleitner, M., & Müller, H. J. (2010). Contextual cueing of pop-out visual search: when context guides the deployment of attention. Journal Of Vision, 10(5), 20, 21-11. doi: 10.1167/10.5.20.
124. Mayberry, C. R., Livesey, E. J., & Dux, P. E. (2010). Rapid learning of rapid temporal contexts.Psychonomic bulletin & review, 17(3), 417-420.
125. Makovski, T., & Jiang, Y. (2010). Contextual cost: when a visual-search target is not where it should be. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(2), 216-225.
126. Ogawa, H., & Watanabe, K. (2010). Time to learn: Evidence for two types of attentional guidance in contextual cueing. Perceptition, 39, 72-80.
127. Smith, A. D., Hood, B. M., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2010). Probabilistic cuing in large-scale environmental search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(3), 605.
128. Wagener, A., & Hoffmann, J. (2010). Temporal cueing of target-identity and target-location.Experimental psychology.

2011

129. Conci, M., Sun, L., & Müller, H. J. (2011). Contextual remapping in visual search after predictable target-location changes. Psychological Research, 75, 279-289.
130. Conci, M., & von Mühlenen, A. (2011). Limitations of perceptual segmentation on contextual cueing in visual search. Visual Cognition, 19(2), 203-233.
131. Couperus, J. W., Hunt, R. H., Nelson, C. A., & Thomas, K. M. (2011). Visual search and contextual cueing: differential effects in 10-year-old children and adults.Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(2), 334-348.
132. Goujon, A. (2011). Categorical implicit learning in real-world scenes: Evidence from contextual cueing.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(5), 920-941.
133. Jiménez-Fernández, G., Vaquero, J. M., Jiménez, L., & Defior, S. (2011). Dyslexic children show deficits in implicit sequence learning, but not in explicit sequence learning or contextual cueing. Annals of dyslexia, 61(1), 85-110.
134. Jiménez, L., & Vázquez, G. A. (2011). Implicit sequence learning and contextual cueing do not compete for central cognitive resources. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(1), 222.
135. Kunar, M. A., & Wolfe, J. M. (2011). Target absent trials in configural contextual cuing.Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(7), 2077-2091.
136. Luhmann, C. C. (2011). Integrating spatial context learning over contradictory signals: Recency effects in contextual cueing. Vision cognition, 19(7), 846-862.
137. Liechty, M. M., & Madhavan, P. (2011, September). An eye movement analysis of contextual cueing effects. InProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 222-226). SAGE Publications.
138. Makovski, T., & Jiang, Y. (2011). Investigating the role of response in spatial context learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(8), 1563-1579.
139. Makovski, T., & Jiang, Y. V. (2011). Investigating the role of response in spatial context learning.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(8), 1563-1579.
140. Manginelli, A. A., Geringswald, F., & Pollmann, S. (2011). Visual search facilitation in repeated displays depends on visuospatial working memory. Experimental psychology.
141. Neider, M. B., & Kramer, A. F. (2011). Older adults capitalize on contextual information to guide search.Experimental aging research, 37(5), 539-571.
142. Ogawa, H., & Watanabe, K. (2011). Implicit learning increases preference for predictive visual display.Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(6), 1815-1822.
143. Olivers, C. N. (2011). Long-term visual associations affect attentional guidance. Acta psychologica,137(2), 243-247.
144. Oudman, E., Van der Stigchel, S., Wester, A. J., Kessels, R. P., & Postma, A. (2011). Intact memory for implicit contextual information in Korsakoff’s amnesia. Neuropsychologia,49(10), 2848-2855.
145. Schankin, A., Hagemann, D., & Schubö, A. (2011). Is contextual cueing more than the guidance of visual–spatial attention?.Biological psychology, 87(1), 58-65.
146. Simon, J. R., Stollstorff, M., Westbay, L. C., Vaidya, C. J., Howard, J. H., & Howard, D. V. (2011). Dopamine transporter genotype predicts implicit sequence learning. Behavioural brain research, 216(1), 452-457.
147. Smyth, A. C., & Shanks, D. R. (2011). Aging and implicit learning: Explorations in contextual cuing.Psychology and aging, 26(1), 127.
148. Smyth, Andrea C., and Magda Osman. Can Sleep Enhance both Implicit and Explicit Processes?.
149. Tseng, P., Hsu, T. Y., Tzeng, O. J., Hung, D. L., & Juan, C. H. (2011). Probabilities in implicit learning.Perception, 40(7), 822-829.
150. Van Asselen, M., Sampaio, J., Pina, A., & Castelo-Branco, M. (2011). Object based implicit contextual learning: a study of eye movements. Attention, perception & psychophysics, 73(2), 297-302.
151. Westerberg, C. E., Miller, B. B., Reber, P. J., Cohen, N. J., & Paller, K. A. (2011). Neural correlates of contextual cueing are modulated by explicit learning. Neuropsychologia, 49(12), 3439-3447.
152. Yoshida, H., Darby, K., & Burling, J. (2011). Cued attention and learning of spatial context in children. InProceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1741-1746). Cognitive Science Society Austin, TX.
153. Zellin, M., Conci, M., von Mühlenen, A., & Müller, H. J. (2011). Two (or three) is one too many: testing the flexibility of contextual cueing with multiple target locations. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 73(7), 2065-2076.

2012

155. Beesley, T., & Shanks, D. R. (2012). Investigating cue competition in contextual cuing of visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(3), 709.
156. Conci, M., & Müller, H. J. (2012). Contextual learning of multiple target locations in visual search. Visual Cognition, 20(7), 746-770.
157. Conci, M., Zellin, M., & Müller, H. J. (2012). Whatever after next? Adaptive predictions based on short-and long-term memory in visual search.Frontiers in psychology, 3, 409.
158. Davoli, C. C., Brockmole, J. R., & Goujon, A. (2012). A bias to detail: How hand position modulates visual learning and visual memory.Memory & cognition, 40(3), 352-359.
159. Geyer, T., Baumgartner, F., Müller, H. J., & Pollmann, S. (2012). Medial temporal lobe-dependent repetition suppression and enhancement due to implicit vs. explicit processing of individual repeated search displays. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 6(272). doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00272 .
160. Geringswald, F., Baumgartner, F., & Pollmann, S. (2012). Simulated loss of foveal vision eliminates visual search advantage in repeated displays. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 6, 1-9. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00134.
161. Goujon, A., Brockmole, J. R., & Ehinger, K. A. (2012). How Visual and Semantic Information Influence Learning in Familiar Contexts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 1315-1327.
162. Liechty, M., & Madhavan, P. (2012, September). An Assessment of Spatial Context on Eye Movement During a Visual Search Task. InProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 56, No. 1, pp. 348-352). Sage Publications.
163. Kasper, R. W., Grafton, S. T., Eckstein, M. P., & Giesbrecht, B. (2012). Investigating the neural correlates of visual attention and response selection in contextual cueing. Journal of Vision, 12(9), 1147-1147.
164. Kaida, K., Takeda, Y., & Tsuzuki, K. (2012). Can a short nap and bright light function as implicit learning and visual search enhancers?.Ergonomics, 55(11), 1340-1349.
165. Kakalios, L. C., Jutras, M. J., Tompkins, M. L., Bachevalier, J., & Buffalo, E. A. Assessing Relational Memory in Monkeys with a Contextual Cueing Task.
166. Kourkoulou, A., Leekam, S. R., & Findlay, J. M. (2012). Implicit learning of local context in autism spectrum disorder.Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 42(2), 244-256.
167. Manelis, A., & Reder, L. M. (2012). Procedural learning and associative memory mechanisms contribute to contextual cueing: Evidence from fMRI and eye-tracking.Learning & Memory, 19(11), 527-534.
168. Patai, E. Z., Doallo, S., & Nobre, A. C. (2012). Long-term memories bias sensitivity and target selection in complex scenes.Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 24(12), 2281-2291.
169. Pollmann, S. (2012). Anterior prefrontal contributions to implicit attention control.Brain sciences, 2(2), 254-266.
170. Schlagbauer, B., Müller, H. J., Zehetleitner, M., & Geyer, T. (2012). Awareness in contextual cueing of visual search as measured with concurrent access- and phenomenal-consciousness tasks. Journal of Vision, 12(1).
171. Tsuchiai, T., Matsumiya, K., Kuriki, I., & Shioiri, S. (2012). Implicit learning of viewpoint-independent spatial layouts. Frontiers in psychology, 3(207), 1-10
172. van Asselen, M., Almeida, I., Júlio, F., Januário, C., Campos, E. B., Simões, M., & Castelo-Branco, M. (2012). Implicit contextual learning in prodromal and early stage Huntington’s disease patients. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 18(04), 689-696.
173. Zhao, G., Liu, Q., Jiao, J., Zhou, P., Li, H., & Sun, H.-j. (2012). Dual-state modulation of the contextual cueing effect: Evidence from eye movement recordings. Journal of Vision, 12(6), 11:11-13. doi: 10.1167/12.6.11

2013

174. Annac, E., Manginelli, A. A., Pollmann, S., Shi, Z., Müller, H. J., & Geyer, T. (2013). Memory under pressure: Secondary-task effects on contextual cueing of visual search. Journal Of Vision, 13(13), 1-15. doi: 10.1167/13.13.6
175. Conci, M., Müller, H. J., & von Mühlenen, A. (2013). Object-based implicit learning in visual search:Perceptual segmentation constrains contextual cueing. Journal of Vision, 13(3), 1-17. doi: 10.1167/13.3.15
176. Geringswald, F., Herbik, A., Hoffmann, M. B., & Pollmann, S. (2013). Contextual cueing impairment in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Journal of Vision, 13(3). doi: 10.1167/13.3.28
177. Geyer, T., Mueller, H. J., Assumpcao, L., & Gais, S. (2013). Sleep-effects on implicit and explicit memory in repeated visual search. PLoS ONE, 8(8).
178. Giesbrecht, B., Sy, J. L., & Guerin, S. A. (2013). Both memory and attention systems contribute to visual search for targets cued by implicitly learned context. Vision research, 85, 80-89.
179. Goujon, A., & Fagot, J. (2013). Learning of spatial statistics in nonhuman primates: contextual cueing in baboons (Papio papio). Behavioural brain research, 247, 101-109.
180. Jiang, Y., & Swallow, K. M. (2013). Body and head tilt reveals multiple frames of reference for spatial attention. Journal of Vision, 13(13). doi: 10.1167/13.13.9
181. Jiang, Y. V., Sigstad, H. M., & Swallow, K. M. (2013). The time course of attentional deployment in contextual cueing. Psychonomic bulletin & review,20(2), 282-288.
182. Jiang, Y. V., Capistrano, C. G., Esler, A. N., & Swallow, K. M. (2013). Directing attention based on incidental learning in children with autism spectrum disorder. Neuropsychology, 27(2), 161.
183. Jiang, Y. V., Swallow, K. M., & Rosenbaum, G. M. (2013). Guidance of spatial attention by incidental learning and endogenous cuing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(1), 285.
184. Jiang, Y. V., & Swallow, K. M. (2013). Spatial reference frame of incidentally learned attention. Cognition, 126(3), 378-390.
185. Jiang, Y. V., Swallow, K. M., Rosenbaum, G. M., & Herzig, C. (2013). Rapid acquisition but slow extinction of an attentional bias in space.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(1), 87.
186. Kunar, M. A., John, R., & Sweetman, H. (2013). A configural dominant account of contextual cueing: Configural cues are stronger than colour cues. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.863373
187. Kourkoulou, A., Kuhn, G., Findlay, J. M., & Leekam, S. R. (2013). Eye movement difficulties in autism spectrum disorder: implications for implicit contextual learning. Autism Research, 6(3), 177-189.
188. Manginelli, A. A., Baumgartner, F., & Pollmann, S. (2013). Dorsal and ventral working memory-related brain areas support distinct processes in contextual cueing. Neuroimage, 67, 363-374.
189. Manginelli, A. A., Langer, N., Klose, D., & Pollmann, S. (2013). Contextual cueing under working memory load: Selective interference of visuospatial load with expression of learning.Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75(6), 1103-1117.
190. Meyer, T., Smeets, T., Giesbrecht, T., Quaedflieg, C. W., & Merchelbach, H. (2013). Acute stress differentially affects spatial configuration learning in high and low cortisol-responding healthy adults. European journal of psychotraumatology, 4.
191. Rosenbaum, G. M., & Jiang, Y. V. (2013). Interaction between scene-based and array-based contextual cueing. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0446-9
192. Shi, Z., Zang, X., Jia, L., Geyer, T., & Müller, H. J. (2013). Transfer of contextual cueing in full-icon display remapping. Journal of Vision, 13(3), 1-10. doi: 10.1167/13.3.2
193. Schwark, J., & Dolgov, I. (2013). The influence of spatial and feature probability cuing in visual search.Perception, 42(4), 470-472.
194. Geyer, T., Mueller, H. J., Assumpcao, L., & Gais, S. (2013). Sleep-effects on implicit and explicit memory in repeated visual search. PloS one, 8(8), e69953.
195. Tseng, Y.-C., & Lleras, A. (2013). Rewarding context accelerates implicit guidance in visual search. Attention, perception & psychophysics, 75(2), 287-298.
196. Travis, S. L., Mattingley, J. B., & Dux, P. E. (2013). On the role of working memory in spatial contextual cueing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(1), 208.
197. Travers, B. G., Powell, P. S., Mussey, J. L., Klinger, L. G., Crisler, M. E., & Klinger, M. R. (2013). Spatial and identity cues differentially affect implicit contextual cueing in adolescents and adults with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of autism and developmental disorders,43(10), 2393-2404.
198. Zellin, M., Conci, M., Von Mühlenen, A., & Müller, H. J. (2013). Here Today, Gone Tomorrow – Adaptation to Change in Memory-Guided Visual Search. Plos ONE, 8(3). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059466
199. Zellin, M., von Mühlenen, A., Müller, H. J., & Conci, M. (2013). Statistical learning in the past modulates contextual cueing in the future. Journal of Vision, 13(3).

2014

200. Bellaera, L., von Mühlenen, A., & Watson, D. G. (2014). When being narrow minded is a good thing: Locally biased people show stronger contextual cueing.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(6), 1242-1248.
201. Conci, M., & Müller, H. J. (2014). Global scene layout modulates contextual learning in change detection. Frontiers in psychology.
202. Darby, K. P., Burling, J. M., & Yoshida, H. (2014). The role of search speed in the contextual cueing of children’s attention. Cognitive development, 29, 17-29.
203. Feldmann-Wüstefeld, T., & Schubö, A. (2014). Stimulus homogeneity enhances implicit learning: evidence from contextual cueing. Vision research, 97, 108-116.
204. Goujon, A., Didierjean, A., & Poulet, S. (2014). The emergence of explicit knowledge from implicit learning. Memory & cognition, 42(2), 225-236.
205. Jiang, Y., Swallow, K. M., & Capistrano, C. G. (2014). Visual search and location probability learning from variable perspectives. Journal of Vision, 13(6). doi: 10.1167/13.6.13
206. Jiang, Y. V., & Swallow, K. M. (2014). Changing viewer perspectives reveals constraints to implicit visual statistical learning.Journal of vision, 14(12), 3-3.
207. Kunar, M. A., Watson, D. G., Cole, L., & Cox, A. (2014). Negative emotional stimuli reduce contextual cueing but not response times in inefficient search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(2), 377-393.

207. Kunar, M. A., John, R., & Sweetman, H. (2014). A configural dominant account of contextual cueing: Configural cues are stronger than colour cues. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(7), 1366-1382.
208. Lyon, J., Scialfa, C., Cordazzo, S., & Bubric, K. (2014). Contextual cuing: The effects of stimulus variation, intentionality, and aging. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale,68(2), 111.
209. Merrill, E. C., Conners, F. A., Yang, Y., & Weathington, D. (2014). The acquisition of contextual cueing effects by persons with and without intellectual disability. Research in developmental disabilities, 35(10), 2341-2351.
210. McDonnell, G. P., Mills, M., McCuller, L., & Dodd, M. D. (2014). How does implicit learning of search regularities alter the manner in which you search? Psychological Research. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0546-8.
211. Schlagbauer, B., Geyer, T., Müller, H. J., & Zehetleitner, M. (2014). Rewarding distractor context versus rewarding target location: A commentary on Tseng and Lleras (2013). Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76(3), 669-674.
212. Wasserman, E. A., Teng, Y., & Castro, L. (2014). Pigeons exhibit contextual cueing to both simple and complex backgrounds. Behavioural processes, 104, 44-52.
213. Wasserman, E. A., Teng, Y., & Brooks, D. I. (2014). Scene-based contextual cueing in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 40(4), 401.
214. Yang, Y., & Merrill, E. C. (2014). The impact of distracter–target similarity on contextual cueing effects of children and adults. Journal of experimental child psychology, 121, 42-62.
215. Zellin, M., Von Mühlenen, A., Müller, H. J., & Conci, M. (2014). Long-term adaptation to change in implicit contextual learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1-7. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0568-z

2015

217. Assumpção, L., Shi, Z., Zang, X., Müller, H. J., & Geyer, T. (2015). Contextual cueing: implicit memory of tactile context facilitates tactile search. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77, 1212-1222. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0848-y
218. Beesley, T., Vadillo, M. A., Pearson, D., & Shan, D. R. (2015). Pre-exposure of repeated search configurations facilitates subsequent contextual cuing of visual search. Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 41(348-362).
219. Geringswald, F., & Pollmann, S. (2015). Central and peripheral vision loss differentially affects contextual cueing in visual search.Journal of experimental psychology: learning, memory, and cognition, 41(5), 1485.
220. Geringswald, F., Herbik, A., Hofmüller, W., Hoffmann, M. B., & Pollmann, S. (2015). Visual memory for objects following foveal vision loss.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(5), 1471.
221. Gibson, B. M., Leber, A. B., & Mehlman, M. L. (2015). Spatial context learning in pigeons (Columba livia).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 41(4), 336.
222. Goujon, A., Didierjean, A., & Thorpe, S. (2015). Investigating implicit statistical learning mechanisms through contextual cueing. Trends in cognitive sciences,19(9), 524-533.
223. Kasper, R. W., Grafton, S. T., Eckstein, M. P., & Giesbrecht, B. (2015). Multimodal neuroimaging evidence linking memory and attention systems during visual search cued by context.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1339(1), 176-189.
224. Lie, K. P. (2015). Hierarchical acquisition of visual specificity in spatial contextual cueing.Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(1), 160-172.
225. Yamaguchi, M., & Harwood, S. L. (2015). Threat captures attention but does not affect learning of contextual regularities.Cognition and Emotion, 1-8.
226. Yang, Y., & Merrill, E. C. (2015). The impact of signal-to-noise ratio on contextual cueing in children and adults.Journal of experimental child psychology, 132, 65-83.
227. Yang, Y., & Merrill, E. C. (2015). Age-Related Similarities in Contextual Cueing in the Presence of Unpredictive Distracters.The Journal of genetic psychology,176(1), 11-25.
228. Yang, Y., & Merrill, E. C. (2015). Response cost to repeated displays—When previous distractors become targets.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(4), 625-634.
229. Zang, X., Jia, L., Müller, H. J., & Shi, Z. (2015). Invariant spatial context is learned but not retrieved in gaze-contingent limited-viewing search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 41(3), 807-819.

2016

230. Bourgeois, A., Chelazzi, L., & Vuilleumier, P. (2016). How motivation and reward learning modulate selective attention.Progress in Brain Research.
231. Beesley, T., Vadillo, M. A., Pearson, D., & Shanks, D. R. (2016). Configural Learning in Contextual Cuing of Visual Search.
232. Bertels, J., San Anton, E., Gebuis, T., & Destrebecqz, A. (2016). Learning the association between a context and a target location in infancy.Developmental Science.
233. Colagiuri, B., & Livesey, E. J. (2016). Contextual cuing as a form of nonconscious learning: Theoretical and empirical analysis in large and very large samples.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1-14.
234. Couto, K. C., Navarro, V. M., Smith, T. R., & Wasserman, E. A. (2016). Concept learning without differential reinforcement in pigeons by means of contextual cueing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 42(2), 221.
235. Goldfarb, E. V., Chun, M. M., & Phelps, E. A. (2016). Memory-Guided Attention: Independent Contributions of the Hippocampus and Striatum. Neuron,89(2), 317-324.
236. Geringswald, F., Porracin, E., & Pollmann, S. (2016). Impairment of visual memory for objects in natural scenes by simulated central scotomata.Journal of vision, 16(2), 6-6.
237. Higuchi, Y., Ueda, Y., Ogawa, H., & Saiki, J. (2016). Task-relevant information is prioritized in spatiotemporal contextual cueing.Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 1-14.
238. Makovski, T. (2016). What is the context of contextual cueing?.Psychonomic bulletin & review, 1-7.
239. Pollmann, S., Eštočinová, J., Sommer, S., Chelazzi, L., & Zinke, W. (2016). Neural structures involved in visual search guidance by reward-enhanced contextual cueing of the target location.NeuroImage, 124, 887-897.
240. Vadillo, M. A., Konstantinidis, E., & Shanks, D. R. (2016). Underpowered samples, false negatives, and unconscious learning.Psychonomic bulletin & review, 23(1), 87-102.
241. Zang, X., Geyer, T., Assumpção, L., Mueller, H. J., & Shi, Z. (2016). From foreground to background: how task-neutral context influences contextual cueing of visual search.Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 852.